Textbooks that decision was to find the "unanimity." Effective decision-makers, but often intentionally do not follow the principle of textbooks, intended to "create" conflict with each other different views.
Negative views of the positive
Why the negative comments are mainly three reasons.
First, the negative views of policy makers to protect the organization from becoming captives.
In an organization, everyone has to rely on decision makers, want the competent decision-making to their advantage. Only able to break through the trap, so that policy makers will not become a party to prisoners approach lies in the argument that, to grasp the negative evidence and considered views of the tempering.
Second, the negative views of themselves, it is for decision-making "another program." Decision-making only one program, no other choice, with gambling He Yi? If the decision-making process has several programs to choose from, the decision-makers into the attack or retreat to safety, there is room for multiple reflection and comparison; the other hand, only Last Stand of the decision makers.
In 1914, Germany, Shuli Fen strategic plan decision-making failure very representative. The original plan to a head, was found dead the. In fact after 25 years of strategy development, the German General Staff did not expect growth to be from another program will have all the power consumption of Shuli Fen project in details. Because the Germans never second strategic plan, so he had the bullet and go step by step to change.
President Roosevelt's story just the opposite. Before he became president, the election campaign is planned on a traditional 19th century based on the international economic theory. But at the same time, Roosevelt There is another group came to be known as the "think tank" of professionals, specializing in "alternative." President Roosevelt was elected in November 1932, 2 years, took office in March. Who knows in this short period of more than four months, both international and domestic economic slump. In the original orthodox economic plan will not work, he immediately goes to the first two sets of proposed plans. If Roosevelt had no other options, I am afraid that he would like the German General Staff, as confused and overwhelmed.
Third, the negative opinions can stimulate the imagination. Just find the answer to a question, not need imagination; but a manager deal with problems, usually "uncertainty" high, the need for "creative" solutions to create a new situation. Managers can not lack of imagination from a different, new perspective to observe and understand.
Imagination needs to be stimulated before full. Different opinions, especially those who think after careful and repeated inference, the argument full of different views, stimulate imagination is the most effective factor.
An old story, Victorian South China Sea Islanders to the West, a small island travel, and coming back to talk about him in the West see the "miracle" --- the home of the West but did not drink. But people in the West really did not water? It was only because Western countries are using a tap, opened the tap water when needed. But the Islanders travel in the West, no one can tell him turn on the tap water.
Every time I hear this story, people will think of the imagination. Imagination is like water, must turn on the "tap" will out. And stimulate debate in the "negative opinions", is the imagination of tap water.
Good decisions, not from the "unanimous" in come. Said Sloan, president of General Motors in an internal high-level meeting, said: "Gentlemen, in my opinion, we already have this decision is fully consistent view of the." Attended the meeting of the members nodded . But he added: "Now, I declared the meeting concluded that the issue be postponed until the next meeting for further discussion. I hope that the next meeting to hear the contrary view, the only way we can get on the decision-making really understand. "Sloan never make decisions by" intuition ", always stressed the need to test with a view of the facts, know the right decisions must be based on different views on the basis of full discussion.
Stimulate objections superb
In American history, every effective president, all the objections have inspired ways to help their understanding of the facts from various angles to make effective decisions. Washington said that most want to see conflict and debate, I hope there is a consensus of the cabinet. But in fact, Washington in dealing with important issues, often to seek Hamilton, respectively (Washington Times Secretary of the Treasury) and Jefferson (President of the United States No. 3) views, in order to obtain different views.
Most know how to use different views of the U.S. President, Franklin Roosevelt, when the devaluation. Each case of major events, he always invite one of his assistant, said: "You study a problem, but please keep confidential (Roosevelt, of course know, he asked Assistant 'confidential'', will inevitably make the problem spread quickly in Washington). "and then invite him to several other assistants, knowing that a number of assistants has been an assistant with the first differences of opinion, but also asked them to study where the same problem, but also asking them to" conservative secrets. " In this way, Roosevelt will be able to collect different opinions, but also from the perspective of a different problem. Of course, Roosevelt to do so, he has his own take anyone's advice would not be trapped.
Roosevelt the hand, has been fierce criticism of the Interior Yiji Si. However, Roosevelt makes his views, he thought, as the U.S. President, the main task is not to maintain political power, but to make decisions --- but to make the right decisions, the best way is to follow the Court of methods, from both sides of the debate, to obtain the truth, so that all the relevant facts can be placed before the judge.
Questioned on the need for decision-making
Finally, effective managers have to ask the question: "Do we really need a decision?" Sometimes it does not make any new decisions, is the best decision possible. Make a decision like moving a surgical operation. Any new policy decisions are inevitably affected the existing system, how many have to take risks. Less than non-surgery the surgeon can not, never give surgery; the same, not intended for decision-making time, that should not make decisions lightly.
When necessary decision-making? If you continue to conservative conventions, the situation will deteriorate, it must make new decisions. Experience is essential, fleeting in the new opportunities, it must immediately make a new decision.
Bell served as president of Fair, many people have seen the company be taken over by the government. Are all trying to save, but the way the sake of argument --- some are against this or that government bills, some members of Congress and the draw against the lawmakers who ... ... only Phil recognizes that such an approach is definitely not to save companies deteriorate, the fundamental approach must be taken to create a new situation, and eventually established a "public control", to avoid the company taken over by the government.
Negative decision is not to make any decisions. We ask ourselves: "maintain the status quo, what will happen?" If the answer is: "will not change." Then why should we complicate the matter?
Managers to understand this out and is probably not much. Financial crises, a treasurer was, crying out for lower costs, however small and to reduce costs, even if results are negligible. For example, he found a department "and more" old with the 23 staff, was clamoring for layoffs. Old people say that 23 staff are due to retire, the dismissal is too perverse, but he would not listen. After this incident, the company does not remember his colleagues who had saved the company; we only remember his elixir, said he and 23 do not get along with him against the old staff.
In fact, 2000 years ago Roman law stated that: "The Chief Executive should not be considered trivial sort of thing." Until today, our policy-makers also need to learn this sentence.
Our problem is how much improvement, but not how to do real change and innovation.瀵硅繖绫婚棶棰橈紝铏戒笉浣滄柊鍐崇瓥鎴戜滑鍚屾牱鑳藉鐢熷瓨锛屼絾鏈変簡鏂板喅绛栵紝鎯呭喌涔熻浼氬彉寰楁洿濂姐?
銆?? 鍦ㄨ繖绉嶆儏褰笅锛屾湁鏁堢殑绠＄悊鑰呬細浣滄瘮杈冿細浣滃嚭鏂板喅绛栵紝鍙兘鏈変粈涔堟敹鑾峰拰椋庨櫓锛涗笉浣滄柊鍐崇瓥鍙堝彲鑳芥湁浠?箞鎹熷け銆傝嚦浜庡浣曟瘮杈冿紝鍙閬靛惊涓嬮潰鐨勪袱椤瑰師鍒欏氨澶熶簡濡傛灉鍒╃泭杩滃ぇ浜庢垚鏈強椋庨櫓锛屽氨璇ヨ鍔ㄣ?
銆?? 琛屽姩锛屾垨涓嶈鍔紱鍒囧繉鍙仛涓?崐鎴栨姌涓?
銆?? 鍋氫竴娆″垏闄ゆ墎妗冧綋鎴栧垏闄ら槕灏剧殑鎵嬫湳鍥虹劧鏄啋闄╋紝浣嗗鏋滃彧鍒囬櫎涓?崐锛屼笉浣嗘不涓嶄簡鐥咃紝鍙嶅皢寮曡捣鏇翠弗閲嶇殑鍚庢灉銆傚悓鏍凤紝鏈夋晥鐨勫喅绛栬?锛屼細閲囧彇琛屽姩鎴栦笉閲囧彇琛屽姩锛岃?涓嶄細鍙噰鍙栦竴鍗婅鍔ㄣ?
銆?? 涓?垏鏉′欢鍏峰锛氳鑼冨凡缁忔竻妤氫簡锛屼笉鍚屾柟妗堝凡缁忔兂鍒颁簡锛屽緱澶变篃琛￠噺浜嗐?涓?垏閮藉凡缁忎竴鐩簡鐒讹紝鐜板湪灏卞彧绛夌潃鍐崇瓥浜嗐?
銆?? 涓嶅垢鐨勬槸锛岃澶氫汉鍒颁簡杩欎竴姝ュ弽鑰岀姽璞捣鏉ャ?鍐崇瓥鑰呰繖鎵嶁?鎭嶇劧澶ф偀鈥濓紝鍘熸潵鍐崇瓥閭ｄ箞闅惧彈锛岄偅涔堜笉瀹规槗銆備笉浣嗛渶瑕佸垽鏂紝鏇撮渶瑕佸媷姘斻?淇楄瘽璇磋壇鑽嫤鍙ｏ紱鍚屾牱锛屾垜浠笉鏁㈣鎵?湁鐨勫喅绛栭兘浼氳浜鸿寰楃棝鑻︼紝浣嗗疄闄呬笂鏈夋晥鐨勫喅绛栨墽琛岃捣鏉ュ線寰?細璁╀汉浜х敓涓嶆剦蹇殑鎰熻銆?br />
銆?? 鍒颁簡杩欎竴姝ワ紝鏈夋晥鐨勭鐞嗚?缁濅笉浼氳锛氣?璁╂垜浠啀鐮旂┒鐮旂┒!鈥濋偅鍙瘉鏄庤繖浣嶇鐞嗚?缂轰箯鑳嗚瘑銆傛病鏈夎儐璇嗙殑浜哄彲鑳藉け璐ヤ竴鍗冩锛屾湁鑳嗚瘑鐨勪汉鍒欏彧澶辫触涓?锛?br />
銆?? 闈㈠鈥滃啀鐮旂┒鐮旂┒鈥濈殑鍛煎０锛屽崜鏈夋垚鏁堢殑绠＄悊鑰呬細闂細鈥滄槸涓嶆槸鍐嶅仛涓?鐮旂┒灏辫兘璁ㄨ鍑烘柊鏂规鏉?鍗充娇鐮旂┒鍑烘柊鐨勬柟妗堬紝瀹冩槸涓嶆槸涓?畾姣旂幇鏈夌殑鏂规濂?鈥濆鏋滅瓟妗堟槸鍚﹀畾鐨勶紝閭ｄ箞绠＄悊鑰呭氨涓嶉渶瑕佸啀鍘诲仛浠讳綍鐮旂┒锛屼粬缁濅笉浼氬洜涓鸿嚜宸辩殑浼樻煍瀵℃柇鍐嶅幓娴垂鍒汉鐨勬椂闂淬?
相关链接:
Bird, founder of Wu Yimin information: only 40 person-years team 1 million yuan profit
airgcfg.exe Error on startup try this repair
YouTube To WMV
QuickTime to MPEG
Fireworks Produced Hidden Color Photo
YouTube to FLV
Bird, founder of Wu Yimin information: only 40 person-years team 1 million yuan profit
Baidu Xing, Tencent death?
Evaluate Audio Rippers And Converters
Piracy Against A Large, Full Of Discussion Of
Visual Basic to create "FIVE star" level control
Premier Security And Privacy:
Report Hobby
FrontPage2003 Jianzhan all Raiders 1
No comments:
Post a Comment